The First R01 Grant Writing Tool That Saves Time for Researchers AND Grant Offices.
An end-to-end solution that fits any office's pre-award grant process. ResearchGrants.ai cuts proposal time roughly in half, shifting the focus from writing and formatting to the research itself, and from policing compliance to priorities like growing grant revenue.
Spend less time on the mechanics. More time on strategy.
Consistent quality, every department.
Every proposal is structured against NIH review criteria from the first draft, so quality doesn't depend on which department or which researcher's experience level it came from.
Proposal formatting and compliance built in.
Formatting and compliance checks happen as the proposal is written, so your research office spends less time on repetitive fixes and more time on the submissions that actually need your expertise.
Optimized for the NOFO.
Each proposal is structured and checked against the specific requirements of its NOFO, not a generic template, so it's aligned to what that opportunity actually asks for.
Collaborate with your researcher in real time.
Your research office and the researcher work inside the same proposal at the same time, so feedback and revisions happen live instead of over email threads.
New proposal. Work in progress. Prior submission. All welcome.
New Proposal.
Start from a blank page. ResearchGrants guides the proposal from NOFO to Specific Aims to a complete, submission-ready draft.
Work in Progress.
Upload an existing draft and pick up exactly where the researcher left off, without starting the process over.
Prior Submission.
Upload a previously submitted proposal and continue building on it, instead of starting the next version from a blank page.
Incorporate Reviewer Comments.
Upload the summary statement and address each reviewer critique point by point, directly inside the proposal.
The researcher stays the author. Always.
This isn't just about AI. ResearchGrants.ai is built around a simple principle: give researchers structure that mirrors how they actually think through a grant, and let AI accelerate that process, not replace the researcher. The platform speeds up the writing. It doesn't write the science.
- Structure, not just speed. The platform scaffolds a proposal the way a researcher actually thinks it through, guiding a Specific Aims section from hypothesis to approach, rather than just generating text.
- Human-first by design. The PI remains the author of record on every proposal.
- Accelerates, doesn't generate. AI speeds up drafting and revision; it doesn't fabricate claims or data.
- Aligned with NIH policy. Built with NIH's AI guidance (NOT-OD-25-142) in mind from the ground up.
- Transparent for your research office. Full visibility into how AI is used in every proposal your research office reviews.
Built for the research office, not just the researcher.
Proposal Dashboard
See a researcher's proposal status and progress, section by section, from draft to submission.
Reviewer Comment Integration
Upload a summary statement and incorporate reviewer comments point by point.
Standardized Quality
Every proposal checked against NIH review criteria as it's written, not after the fact.
Compliance Checks
Flags omissions and inconsistencies before a proposal reaches your research office's review.
Human-First AI
The researcher remains the author of record; AI accelerates the process, not the science.
NIH AI Policy Alignment
Built around NIH's AI guidance (NOT-OD-25-142) from the ground up.
S2S Submission
A final, formatted proposal submitted directly to Grants.gov. No manual entry.
Data Privacy
Researcher and proposal data are never used to train the platform.
See what it looks like for your office.
Talk to us about how ResearchGrants.ai fits into your institution's grant workflow, from first draft to submission.